Committee Self-Evaluation Survey 2015-16

Please assist us in our effort to improve committee effectiveness by providing your input on this survey. Consider the internal processes, external interactions, and work products as you respond to the questions. Thank you for your participation.

What is your primary function at SBVC?

FT Faculty

Classified

Manager

PT Faculty

Confidential

Student

How long have you served continuously on this committee?

1 Year

3 Years

2 Years

4 or More Years

Did you serve as chair or co-chair of this committee this year?

Yes

Do you expect to serve on this committee again next year?

Yes

Unknown

Please indicate how often the committee's processes, interactions, and outcomes during the year reflected each of the following characteristics:
	Strongly Agree	Agree	Disagree	Strongly Disagree	N/A
Valuable contributions to processes and effectiveness.	Valuable contributions to processes and effectiveness. Strongly Agree	Valuable contributions to processes and effectiveness. Agree	Valuable contributions to processes and effectiveness. Disagree	Valuable contributions to processes and effectiveness. Strongly Disagree	Valuable contributions to processes and effectiveness. N/A
Sharing, inclusiveness, openness to input, and respect for diverse opinions.	Sharing, inclusiveness, openness to input, and respect for diverse opinions. Strongly Agree	Sharing, inclusiveness, openness to input, and respect for diverse opinions. Agree	Sharing, inclusiveness, openness to input, and respect for diverse opinions. Disagree	Sharing, inclusiveness, openness to input, and respect for diverse opinions. Strongly Disagree	Sharing, inclusiveness, openness to input, and respect for diverse opinions. N/A
Effective and meaningful communication with the District community.	Effective and meaningful communication with the District community. Strongly Agree	Effective and meaningful communication with the District community. Agree	Effective and meaningful communication with the District community. Disagree	Effective and meaningful communication with the District community. Strongly Disagree	Effective and meaningful communication with the District community. N/A
Meaningful dialogue.	Meaningful dialogue. Strongly Agree	Meaningful dialogue. Agree	Meaningful dialogue. Disagree	Meaningful dialogue. Strongly Disagree	Meaningful dialogue. N/A
Working properly and productively toward its intended results.	Working properly and productively toward its intended results. Strongly Agree	Working properly and productively toward its intended results. Agree	Working properly and productively toward its intended results. Disagree	Working properly and productively toward its intended results. Strongly Disagree	Working properly and productively toward its intended results. N/A
Efficient use of time.	Efficient use of time. Strongly Agree	Efficient use of time. Agree	Efficient use of time. Disagree	Efficient use of time. Strongly Disagree	Efficient use of time. N/A
Reliance on accurate information rather than speculation and anecdote.	Reliance on accurate information rather than speculation and anecdote. Strongly Agree	Reliance on accurate information rather than speculation and anecdote. Agree	Reliance on accurate information rather than speculation and anecdote. Disagree	Reliance on accurate information rather than speculation and anecdote. Strongly Disagree	Reliance on accurate information rather than speculation and anecdote. N/A
Straight foward and easy to understand content.	Straight foward and easy to understand content. Strongly Agree	Straight foward and easy to understand content. Agree	Straight foward and easy to understand content. Disagree	Straight foward and easy to understand content. Strongly Disagree	Straight foward and easy to understand content. N/A
Clearly defined problems.	Clearly defined problems. Strongly Agree	Clearly defined problems. Agree	Clearly defined problems. Disagree	Clearly defined problems. Strongly Disagree	Clearly defined problems. N/A

Please indicate the extent to which you agree/disagree with the following statements about your service on this committee overall this year.
	Strongly agree	Agree	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
I feel comfortable contributing ideas.	I feel comfortable contributing ideas. Strongly agree	I feel comfortable contributing ideas. Agree	I feel comfortable contributing ideas. Disagree	I feel comfortable contributing ideas. Strongly Disagree
My ideas are treated with respect, whether or not others agree with them.	My ideas are treated with respect, whether or not others agree with them. Strongly agree	My ideas are treated with respect, whether or not others agree with them. Agree	My ideas are treated with respect, whether or not others agree with them. Disagree	My ideas are treated with respect, whether or not others agree with them. Strongly Disagree
I have had sufficient opportunity to provide input into committee recommendations.	I have had sufficient opportunity to provide input into committee recommendations. Strongly agree	I have had sufficient opportunity to provide input into committee recommendations. Agree	I have had sufficient opportunity to provide input into committee recommendations. Disagree	I have had sufficient opportunity to provide input into committee recommendations. Strongly Disagree

	Quality of communication within the committee.	Quality of communication within the committee. Very Good		Quality of communication within the committee. Good		Quality of communication within the committee. Fair		Quality of communication within the committee. Poor		Quality of communication within the committee. Very Poor		Quality of communication within the committee. No Opinion

Please provide an overall rating for the year on the following aspects of the committee's work:
	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor	Very Poor	No Opinion
Clarity of the committee's charge.	Clarity of the committee's charge. Very Good	Clarity of the committee's charge. Good	Clarity of the committee's charge. Fair	Clarity of the committee's charge. Poor	Clarity of the committee's charge. Very Poor	Clarity of the committee's charge. No Opinion
Quality of information flow from the committee to the constituency groups.	Quality of information flow from the committee to the constituency groups. Very Good	Quality of information flow from the committee to the constituency groups. Good	Quality of information flow from the committee to the constituency groups. Fair	Quality of information flow from the committee to the constituency groups. Poor	Quality of information flow from the committee to the constituency groups. Very Poor	Quality of information flow from the committee to the constituency groups. No Opinion
Quality of communication by the committee with the District community as a whole.	Quality of communication by the committee with the District community as a whole. Very Good	Quality of communication by the committee with the District community as a whole. Good	Quality of communication by the committee with the District community as a whole. Fair	Quality of communication by the committee with the District community as a whole. Poor	Quality of communication by the committee with the District community as a whole. Very Poor	Quality of communication by the committee with the District community as a whole. No Opinion
Access to data needed for deliberations.	Access to data needed for deliberations. Very Good	Access to data needed for deliberations. Good	Access to data needed for deliberations. Fair	Access to data needed for deliberations. Poor	Access to data needed for deliberations. Very Poor	Access to data needed for deliberations. No Opinion
Access to meeting space.	Access to meeting space. Very Good	Access to meeting space. Good	Access to meeting space. Fair	Access to meeting space. Poor	Access to meeting space. Very Poor	Access to meeting space. No Opinion
Access to other resources needed for the committee to work effectively.	Access to other resources needed for the committee to work effectively. Very Good	Access to other resources needed for the committee to work effectively. Good	Access to other resources needed for the committee to work effectively. Fair	Access to other resources needed for the committee to work effectively. Poor	Access to other resources needed for the committee to work effectively. Very Poor	Access to other resources needed for the committee to work effectively. No Opinion
Training or mentoring for you as a committee member.	Training or mentoring for you as a committee member. Very Good	Training or mentoring for you as a committee member. Good	Training or mentoring for you as a committee member. Fair	Training or mentoring for you as a committee member. Poor	Training or mentoring for you as a committee member. Very Poor	Training or mentoring for you as a committee member. No Opinion
Establishment of expectations or norms for committee members and chair(s).	Establishment of expectations or norms for committee members and chair(s). Very Good	Establishment of expectations or norms for committee members and chair(s). Good	Establishment of expectations or norms for committee members and chair(s). Fair	Establishment of expectations or norms for committee members and chair(s). Poor	Establishment of expectations or norms for committee members and chair(s). Very Poor	Establishment of expectations or norms for committee members and chair(s). No Opinion
Adherence to expectations or norms for committee members and chair(s).	Adherence to expectations or norms for committee members and chair(s). Very Good	Adherence to expectations or norms for committee members and chair(s). Good	Adherence to expectations or norms for committee members and chair(s). Fair	Adherence to expectations or norms for committee members and chair(s). Poor	Adherence to expectations or norms for committee members and chair(s). Very Poor	Adherence to expectations or norms for committee members and chair(s). No Opinion

	Please enter this committee's most significant accomplishment(s) this year: (500 character max.)

	Please enter the improvement most needed by this committee in its processes, interactions, outcomes, or other aspect of its work: (500 character max.)

	Please include any additional comments below: (500 character max.)

Thank you very much for participating in this important
effort to improve committee processes at SBVC.

Committee Self-Evaluation Survey 2015-16

Please assist us in our effort to improve committee effectiveness by providing your input on this survey. Consider the internal processes, external interactions, and work products as you respond to the questions. Thank you for your participation.

Thank you very much for participating in this importanteffort to improve committee processes at SBVC.

Thank you very much for participating in this important
effort to improve committee processes at SBVC.